Letters to the Editor
By
ACHIEVE HAPPINESS BY GIVING
Resentment is Directly Correlated with Economic Turndowns
Dear Ms. Berns,
While I can’t comment on the veracity of your headline in your
Publisher’s Letter, and though I personally find “giving” provides an
emotional lift to my life, I take serious issue with your last section,
“Why Does Resentment Trump Compassion Today?”
You seem to have completely ignored the economic conditions of the
past few years. Our personal giving is down substantially, not because
of a change in our attitude, but because our financial resources are not
what they once were. And while I am unable to comment upon philanthropy
in other parts of the world, every article and statistic that I read
shows the American culture to be exceedingly generous, and not only for
our domestic causes, but for worldwide causes.
Helping those who are less fortunate than we are is an abiding
principal in our lives and I believe in the lives of a great proportion
of Americans both privately and commercially. But I, like many others,
take issue with those who will not help themselves. I have sympathy for
the family that can’t find work, but I abhor those whose goal seems to
be “how do we scam the system?” And it is those who do so that diminish
the help that might be available for those who are truly deserving.
And it is unarguable that over the past few years, we have become a
“bailout nation.” Both businesses and individuals have their hands out
asking our government and ultimately the taxpayers to pay for poor
decisions and policies and, as well, just plain laziness. As Kennedy
once so eloquently expressed, “Ask not what your country can do for
you, ask what you can do for your country.” The ethic of self-help and
self-reliance has morphed into reliance on others.
I believe you do a disservice by the very narrow focus your article
takes. I would also note that historically, it has been found that
resentment and prejudice are directly correlated to economic turndowns.
Ric Potenz
Neanderthals Ate Their Own?
Studies of the excavations of Neanderthal bones at El Sidron, Spain
revealed that this family had been victims of cannibalism, probably
slaughtered by other Neanderthals who used stone blades made from rocks.
Your publisher’s letter assumed that our ancestral cousins were happier
than we are. Actually, the evidence found in their bones shows
malnutrition might have been a problem for this family. Perhaps
cannibalism was a way of life for some of these early hominids. Today
most humans carry at least 1 to 4 percent Neanderthal DNA in their
genetic makeup. What does all this say about us?
Caroline Anderson
Happiness by Giving
There is no virtue in giving away someone else’s money. The shot at the
“Tea Partiers” is uncalled for. How do you know they are less generous
than others, just because they do not want the Government taking from
one group and giving to another group of voters?
Edward M.
GIFT BOOKS FOR ECON LOVERS
A Wonderful One
Thanks a lot! That’s what all the students need!
Imil Nurutdinov
Who’s a Wannabe?
You inexplicably include Steve Landsburg (PhD ’79) as a Steve Levitt
“wannabe,” while in fact The Armchair Economist was published in 1993,
at which time Steve Levitt was still in graduate school.
Adam
Excellent!
Just bought The Mind of the Market for $6 in Like New condition off Amazon... thanks Mr. Sanderson & Mr. Mankiw!
Wimivo
Great List
But: The Armchair Economist is really the first popular and fun book
describing the economist as a sort of Sherlock Holmes. If anything it
was probably a little too far ahead of its time. I think Coyle’s The
Soulful Science: what economists really do and why it matters as a
better choice (for budding economists anyway) than her “Sex” book. And
Adam Smith’s The Theory of Moral Sentiments is actually a better fit
with the behavioral theme, and arguably even greater than the Wealth of
Nations. Eamonn Butler’s Primer on Adam Smith is short and wonderful
though not a fun book.
Paul Johnson
On Levitt predecessors
And before Landsburg was the book that got me into economics: Abortion,
Baseball and Weed by Doug North and Roger Miller. I read it for a book
report in a high school economics course.
Jeff Smith
What of Turgot and Hume?
Wealth of Nations is of course a great book. But to say it is where
economics started seems inaccurate. What about David Hume's Essays Moral
and Political presages nearly all Smith’s arguments on trade and the
usefulness of merchants. And what about Turgot?
Will
Smith and Coase should rank at the top list
Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations and Ronald Coase’s The Firm, the Market,
and the Law are two most important books in economics. The next three
are Milton Friedman’s Capitalism and Freedom, Friedrich Hayek’s The Road
to Serfdom, and John Maynard Keynes’s General Theory.
DXG
Published: February 11, 2011
Issue: February 2011 Heart Health Issue