New Medical Advances: Prostate Cancer
By PAMELA DITTMER MCKUEN
Jay Cohen, MD, had a choice: Endure surgery for his prostate cancer,
which he was warned, would cause impotence and incontinence, or die a
slow, painful death. Either thought was terrifying. After several
breath-taking minutes, he told the surgeon: “Let’s do it.” ...Then fate stepped in. The prostate surgical
schedule was backed up for three months. That gave Dr. Cohen, whose
specialties are psychiatry and psychopharmacology—not urology—time to
breathe. And to learn everything he could about the disease.
His initial findings said more about what he didn’t know than about what he did.
For example: His repeat tests for prostate specific antigen (PSA), a
protein that may signal cancer, were high, and a biopsy showed low-grade
cancer on the right side of his prostate gland. But was that the only
location? Biopsies frequently miss cancer. Prostatectomy is not
recommended for men whose cancer has spread. If he had the surgery, and
the cancer had metastasized, the surgery and its side effects were
unnecessary.
He was 66 and single, and he needed more details.
Dr. Cohen, a professor in the Department of Preventive Medicine at
the University of California, San Diego, spent a year investigating what
he calls “21st Century technologies.” He researched traditional and
leading-edge diagnostics and treatments as well as the pioneering
practitioners and medical centers. He also steered his own case. When
his urologist said magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) wouldn’t be helpful
because the prostate is too deeply embedded within the pelvis, Dr. Cohen
found an advanced prostate-specific technique and paid for it himself.
Then he underwent a color Doppler ultrasound for further confirmation.
The results: His cancer was small and located in a relatively safe
area. There was a 98 percent chance the cancer would never become
bothersome. His treatment direction changed from certain surgery to
highly-focused active surveillance, a process of regular, frequent
testing.
“Get all the data you can, see what it adds up to, and then talk about treatment choices,” he said.
Dr. Cohen, who was diagnosed in December 2011, today hopes he is
among the 70 percent of men in active surveillance who never need
further treatment. In case he does, he is keeping a watchful eye on new
studies and new advances. He shares his experience, research and
professional contacts in a new book, Prostate Cancer Breakthroughs: New
Tests, New Treatments, Better Options (Oceansong Publishing, 2013).
“So far, I’ve had a good ending,” said Dr. Cohen. “But it was an intense year and a half.”
Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men. About 240,000 new
cases will be diagnosed this year, and about 30,000 will die from the
disease, according to the American Cancer Society. The numbers are
terrifying, but not all of these cancers are deadly. Most men will die
from other causes. As Dr. Cohen found, a major challenge for medical
practitioners is accurately differentiating between the dangerous cases
that
require drastic interventions and those that are not life-threaten-ing.
The long-held model has been conservative and, in many cases, led to more treatment than necessary.
That’s all changing. Prostate cancer is a very active area of medical
research. New tests and treatments have been developed, and more are on
the way. Studies are being conducted in the fields of genetics, early
detection, prevention, surgical techniques and more. Personalized
medicine is the ultimate goal, so that patients are treated exactly as
they need to be treated, and no more.
Here are some of the latest initiatives:
FEWER FALSE-NEGATIVES
Each year more than 1 million biopsies are performed in this country.
The way the procedure has traditionally been performed, for nearly a
quarter-century, is basically blind. Clinicians use a needle to remove
10 to 14 samples from the prostate in hopes of finding whatever cancer
might lie. But those samples represent less than 1 percent of the gland,
leaving many men open to false-negative conclusions or arduous
re-biopsies.
ConfirmMDx is a new molecular diagnostic test
that helps urologists differentiate prostate cancer-free men from those
who may be harboring cancer. Using existing biopsy tissue, the test
detects an epigenetic field effect or “halo” that surrounds cancer
lesions and, thus, widening the margin for error. MDxHealth, based in
Irvine, Calif., and Liege, Belgium, developed the test.
“If the patient has a negative biopsy and ConfirmMDx is negative, the
likelihood of having cancer is very low,” said urologist Allen Chernoff,
MD, who has incorporated ConfirmMDx in his practice at Metro Chicago
Surgical Oncology in Wilmette, Ill. “Therefore, something significant
would have to change, such as a high PSA, for us to re-biopsy.”
If the test comes back positive, the next step is another biopsy, he said.
“Biopsies can be expensive and painful,” he said. “We give a local anaesthetic, but it’s still uncomfortable.
anaesthetic,
but it’s still uncomfortable. There also is the stress of undergoing
the biopsy and waiting for the pathology. We can now save some of our
patients from going through that.”
MRI-CT TARGETED BIOPSY
Prostate cancers are difficult to image with CT technology because of
the limited contrast between normal and malignant tissues. The view
with MRI is improved, but trying to biopsy a patient inside the tubular
machine is cumbersome and time-consuming.
A team of
physicians and engineers at Clark Urology Center at the University of
California, Los Angeles, have shown that prostate cancer can be
diagnosed using image-guided targeted biopsy: Fusing Magnetic Resonance
Imaging with real-time ultrasound. The patient first undergoes MRI to
visualize the prostate and any lesions or suspicious areas. That
information is fed into an imaging machine, the Artemis, by Eigen in
Grass Valley, Calif. The Artemis fuses the MRI pictures with real-time,
three-dimensional ultrasound, allowing the urologist to see the
suspicious areas during the biopsy and aim directly at them.
MOLECULAR STAGING
A longstanding unmet medical need is differentiating between
aggressive and nonaggressive prostate cancer. Abbott is collaborating
with Stanford University in developing a molecular diagnostic test that
could do just that, by using certain biomarkers which may identify which
patients have fast-growing malignancies. The test is in the very early
stages of development.
“Radical surgery comes with
life-altering post-surgical issues,” said Kathryn Becker, global
marketing director in Companion Diagnostics for Abbott Molecular in
Abbott Park, Ill., and who holds a doctorate degree in biology
neuroendocrinology. “It’s a big decision for a family to have the
surgery done. Overall, this genetic test can help establish which men
may be able to undergo a milder course of treatment without such harsh
conditions, especially if they are over 70 or 75.”
SHARPER SCANS DURING RADS
Because the prostate is in constant motion, the need for consistent
monitoring during radiation treatment is critical. Clarity ® 4D
Monitoring software, by Stockholm-based Elekta, offers real-time,
continuous visualization of the precise location of the prostate and
surrounding tissues, thereby allowing clinicians to deliver therapeutic
radiation beams with sub-millimeter accuracy. That capability is
especially important when pursuing advanced protocols such as reduced
margin hypo-fractionation—which entails treating patients in shorter
courses but with longer individual treatments—because radiation exposure
to healthy tissue is minimized. The technology works with a facility’s
existing CT simulation without the extra cost and overhead of a
dedicated MRI. As for the patients, Clarity ® is non-invasive and
requires neither extra radiation doses nor implanted markers.
CATHETER-FREE RECOVERY
Robot-assisted prostatectomy is growing increasingly prevalent. Even
more recent is the “catheter-free” recovery, which was developed at the
Henry Ford Hospital Vattikuti Urology Institute (VUI) in Detroit.
Patients traditionally have a penile catheter to drain urine for up to
10 days while the surgical site heals. The catheter frequently causes
pain and irritation. The no-catheter technique involves draining urine
directly from the bladder via a small tube, much like an IV tube, placed
through an incision in the abdomen.
“This is a paradigm
shift in techniques traditionally used in urologic surgery that allows
us to provide the gold standard of care in prostate cancer while
eliminating the No. 1 complaint expressed by our patients—discomfort
from a penile catheter,” said Nilesh Patil, MD, a VUI-trained urologist
who uses the technique with his patients at Cincinnati-based UC Health
University Hospital.
A DRUG FOR ADVANCED STAGES
About 4 percent of prostate cancer cases spread, or metastasize,
beyond the prostate. Most commonly it goes into the bones, often causing
fractures and other skeletal events that compromise survival.
Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, or mCRPC, is an
advanced stage in which the cancer is resistant to surgery or other
medical treatments that lower testosterone levels and has spread to the
bones, but not to other parts of the body.
This spring
the Food and Drug Administration granted fast-track approval for a new
intravenous radiation injection, Xofigo ®, which has demonstrated
improved survival rates and symptom delay for men with mCRPC. Xofigo ®,
developed and marketed by Bayer HealthCare in Wayne, NJ, is an alpha
particle-emitting radioactive therapeutic agent with an anti-tumor
effect on bone metastases. Study results showed men receiving the
injections plus best standard of care lived a median of more than three
months longer than those who received placebo plus best standard of
care.
THE PSA CONTROVERSY
Perhaps
the biggest controversy is over PSA screening, the first line of defence
since its introduction in 1987. The nearly universal recommendation
until now called for men age 40 and over to be tested yearly. In May,
the American Urological Association revised its guidelines: Routine
screening is no longer recommended for men of average risk under age 55
or over age 70. The changes ignite debate between saving lives versus
harmful over-reaction and over-treatment.
“PSA is like
any other tool—it needs to be used properly,” said Dr. Chernoff. “When
it is not used properly, it is a bad tool. That doesn’t mean you throw
it away. It means you learn to use it better. The more we can say you do
or do not have cancer, the better we can discuss where we go from
here.”
“The new 21st Century technologies will change
everything,” said Dr. Cohen. “As they become routine, it will make sense
to do PSAs again.”
Published: September 03, 2013
Issue: Fall 2013 Issue